• This is default featured slide 1 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by NewBloggerThemes.com.

  • This is default featured slide 2 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by NewBloggerThemes.com.

  • This is default featured slide 3 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by NewBloggerThemes.com.

  • This is default featured slide 4 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by NewBloggerThemes.com.

  • This is default featured slide 5 title

    Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by NewBloggerThemes.com.

‏إظهار الرسائل ذات التسميات Identifying Market Trend. إظهار كافة الرسائل
‏إظهار الرسائل ذات التسميات Identifying Market Trend. إظهار كافة الرسائل

Using Swing Points To Identify Price Reversals

We know that there is no such thing as a 'holy grail' in Forex trading. However, when it comes to Forex charting, there is something that comes really close, and that is Swing Points. In fact, Swing Points really are the trader's best friend as they are so much simpler to spot than complicated candlestick patterns with exotic sounding names, and more consistent in meaning when found at significant confluences of support or resistance. If you train your eyes to see these simple yet powerful chart structures and make them the central point of your analysis, you will be amazed at how much more accurate your trading calls will become. Guaranteed.

So, what exactly are Swing Points? A Swing Point (SP) High is an upside price extreme (ideally, but not necessarily represented by a price rejection wick) both preceded and followed by two lower highs on each side. This means that there needs to be at least five candles in the pattern. On the other hand, a SP Low can be defined as a downside price extreme (again, detected most easily by a price rejection wick) both preceded and followed by two higher lows on each side. The diagram below illustrates this concept.


The relationship of the two candles on either side of the price extreme to one another is not important, except that they have to be above a Low, or below a High. If they equal or exceed the extreme of the middle candle, then the pattern is considered not valid. An acceptable variation of this pattern is when the price extreme is found on two middle candles instead of one, resulting in a pattem consisting of six candles in total.

Now that we know how to identtify them, what is it about Swing Points that makes them so great? I can think of three things.

Firstly, Swing Points are a 'natural' indicator, i.e. they are found within price action itself, and they show you in real time when a potential change is underway. By contrast, technical indicators (at least lagging ones like Moving Averages and MACD), usually need a little time to catch up to the turn.

Secondly, Swing Points relate to the wave structure of price action in a very direct way. In other words, constituent waves of a larger pattern - whether an impulse or a retracement - very often mark both their beginning and end points, on a SP High and Low. Obviously, this can be very helpful in detecting turns in the market.

Thirdly, on a lower level chart (e.g. 15 minutes), Swing Points can provide an effective signal for both entering and exiting a trade with relatively limited risk; and often, right when the market is about to start moving in the direction favorable to the trade. Can you think of any technical indicators that can do all that?

Now, here's the challenge. While SP Highs & Lows do serve extremely useful purposes, they share something in common with conventional indicators (although occurring less often): the potential to yield 'fake' readings. Generally, this is more of the case on lower than on higher timeframes. On a Monthly chart, for example, well-formed SP Highs & Lows are far more likely to channel a turn into a major, many months' (or possibly years') long trend than on the 5 minute chart, where they can be overly abundant, sometimes reflecting mere noise. In other words, a 'fake' SP High or Low (as opposed to an invalid SP High or Low) is one that possesses all the characteristics indicated in the diagram above, but without accurately signifying a major price reversal.

Therefore, an important principle to remember is that we need a confluence of events to justify every single trading decision we make. This is because no matter how good the pattern, or the signal, or the measurement, none of them is so consistently reliable that we can safely use it by itself. So, while 'fake' Swing Point readings do occur, so too do 'fake' signals on trendline breaks, Fibonacci levels, Head & Shoulder patterns, oscillator divergences, or anything you can think of. But we don't give up on them because of it. Trading is only a probability, never a certainty. We should only respond to those trading oppotunities where the weight of evidence puts the balance of probabilities in favor of the market moving decisively in one direction or the other. Thus, we'll always look to confirm a SP High or Low with other things.

1. Start and End of Wave Structure
The following chart shows a market top clearly marked to the left. As we can see, the trend turned down thereafter with lower lows and lower highs, and a clear contrast between those linear looking legs down in line with trend, interrupted briefly by overlapping or flat periods of consolidation or retracement. Within this procession, we can see both SP Highs (marked by red arrows, usually signaling an opportunity to sell the rallies in the downtrend) and SP Lows (marked by green arrows, usually signaling near-term excesses of selling pressure).


While there are other Swing Point formations on this chart which are not marked, we nonetheless see that every single significant wave within the larger formation did start and end with a valid Swing Point. For instance, the third small corrective wave up from the left hand side of the chart (labeled 6) marks the end of a pullback to very near the 38% Fibonacci retracement level of the preceding leg down. That SP High marked both the end of a corrective leg and the start of the continuation down in line with trend.

Selling that rally at 1.4414 and holding it through to the start of the next major corrective pullback at 1.4029 (labeled 11 on the chart) represented an opportunity of 385 pips. You may want to look closely at all the marked portions of this chart example to see how Swing Points confirmed similar reversals, whether with or against the trend.


2. Well-timed Entry Signals with Limited Risk
When we have carefully analyzed all our charts from the higher to lower time frames and concluded that a high-probability setup is unfolding, that's where we can drill down to successively lower timeframes to look for a SP High or Low to trigger into the trade. You may have indicator signals you already like to work with for that purpose - such as a fast Moving Average crossover or a Parabolic SAR reversal - and that's fine. But what a Swing Point entry can do for you is both confirm the indicator signal and get you in, right when the market is turning. Again, it often takes an indicator a few bars to catch up with the Swing Point, so with this method you might actually enjoy a faster entry which can both reduce the size of your stop and increase your profit levels.

As a simple entry trigger, it is on the open of the first candle after the five candles comprising the SP pattern when a market order can be executed. In other words, all five candles in the pattern must have closed before action can be taken. Don't be too excited to jump into the trade that you don't wait for that last candle to close. A SP pattern wouldn't be based on five candle closes if it wasn't for a good reason. Trust the setup and wait patiently for it - it works.

The two charts below show a H4 chart followed by a concurrent M15 chart. On the higher time frame chart, we see a very large-scale corrective pullback against the uptrend, down to the Monthly Central Pivot (the horizontal black dashed line) - a potentially powerful support area. Price eventually pulled up from that area (circled, with green arrow marker), forming a higher degree SP Low. At the exact same point that price was nearing that support, a SP Low was confirmed on the M15 chart (again, on the close of the two following candles with higher lows). As can be seen from this example, once price started to move in the opposite direction, there was virtually no drawdown whatsoever: a very clean entry point with limited risk. Though this is admittedly something of a 'cherry-picked' example, it is fairly representative of price action in conjunction with quality Swing Points that we're always on the lookout for.



The above example demonstrates a bit of a dilemma we face, though, looking for Swing Points on different timeframes concurrently. If we want to act on the signal on the M15 chart, how do we know it will be confirmed by a later Swing Point on the H4 chart? If we wait for it on the H4 chart, won't the market have moved off the Swing Point on the M15 chart? In the live edge of trading, we can't know the answers to those questions definitively. The point is, when we execute on a low level timeframe, we are forced to act on incomplete information (the as-yet unconfirmed Swing Point on the higher timeframe, for example). That's where a confluence of events becomes so important - we need lots of evidence of support on several timeframes when we go long, and similarly, we need lots of evidence of resistance on several timeframes when we go short. That's the insurance we need to act on the low-level Swing Point.


3. Well-timed Exit Signals for Maximum Profit
Finally, the chart below looks at the closing side of the trade from the two charts above. Entering long where we did, and with a well-informed outlook that had the market rising in a larger 5-wave impulse pattern, a logical place to take profit would have been on or near a retest of the Old High resistance area (from the H4 chart), here marked' A'. You could have simply set an Exit Limit for a few pips shy of that Old High and left well enough alone. But let's say, you initially decided against that strategy. Then later, watching the live edge of the market as price approached that resistance level, maybe you changed your mind; perhaps the momentum of the move was starting to look questionable, so you decided it was a good place to take profit after all.


In this case, the SP High ending a leg up on a lower timeframe in close proximity to a documented resistance area would provide an excellent place to cover the long, just before price started a pullback, or possibly an outright reversal. In this example (a M30 chart), from the entry point on the third candle after the SP Low, to the exit on the open of the third candle after the SP High near the old resistance level, the total size of the run (excluding spread) was: (1.6970-1.6745) = +225 pips. This example has shown how Swing Points are realistically used in actua1 trading situations, as the logic of the profit target selected was quite typical.

If you are not familiar with Swing Points, the best thing to do is to simply practice, practice, and practice! A useful assignment might be to print off a single hard copy of each of the charts you work with for any Forex pair you like to trade (Monthly on down to M15), and simply circle every single SP High and Low you see, as per the guidelines specified above. Then ask yourself: Where did price go after each Swing Point? What was it about the Swing Points where sharp reversals happened that made them different from less effective Swing Points?

Were there other things going on in the chart at the same time? As you research these issues yourself, in particular by applying some of the other tools of technical analysis, hopefully you'll start to develop a sense for which Swing Points are meaningful, and why are not.
Share:

Monitoring Market Trend With COT Metrics

In case you are not familiar with it, let's have a quick overview of the widely proclaimed and yet widely misunderstood Commitments of Traders (COT) report. The primary agency with regulatory supervision of commodity futures and options markets in the United States is the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The CFTC's stated mandate is to ''protect market users and the public from fraud, manipulation, and abusive practices related to the sale of commodity and financial futures and options, and to foster open, competitive, and financially sound futures and option markets".

In line with this mandate, the CFTC collects and circulates data on Open Interest (number of contracts held, long and short) for markets in which 20 or more traders hold positions equal to or above the reporting levels established by the CFTC. In practical terms, this means almost any liquid financial market publicly traded in the United States, including currencies. The reason for doing so is to nurture a level playing field, so that the price effects that could result from large swings in market participants' buying and selling activities can be known in a reasonably timely and open manner.

Now, the question is, why should we care about the futures markets since we are trading the cash market? This is because the futures market for currencies leads the cash market, and both markets actually trend in a parallel fashion. This means that, if we were to overlay the price plot for the EUR/USD Forex pair on top of the price plot for Euro futures, they would look pretty much the same. We can therefore assume that the currency futures price is a proxy for the Forex market. In simple terms, changes in buying and selling activity in the futures world would eventually affect Forex price movement.

The primary groups of traders traditionally covered by the COT report include the following:
  • Commercials - Large corporate entities that use futures markets to hedge against business risks pertaining to the commodity which they manufacture or distribute (e.g. a grain pool which sells wheat on the open market). Commercial traders are typically counter-trend traders, not speculators.
  • Large Traders - Financial market entities who speculate on the price movements of the underlying commodity without either providing or taking physical delivery of it (e.g. a hedge fund which trades and invests in various assets on behalf of its clients). Large Traders are typically trendfollowers.
  • Small Traders - Primarily private traders holding positions in futures or options that are below the reporting threshold specified by the CFTC. Since Small Traders do not report to the CFTC, their positions are inferred as the residual of Commercials' and Large Traders' open interest in each market from the known total.
The COT report is published every Friday by the CFTC, based on reporting data submitted the Tuesday prior. COT data can show us the Net Long or Net Short positions taken by the above three categories of market participant, and highlight significant changes from one week to the next which may warn us in advance of accumulation/distribution campaigns that could affect price. The CFTC does not publish corresponding price data, but this critically important data can be obtained from other sources.

There are many different ways in which COT data can be interpreted. Some analysts look for extremes within a range of 6, 12, 24 or 36-month look-back periods by calculating a simple Stochastics index on the respective positions, often with the corresponding price series plotted as an overlay. This will tend to reveal when one category of trader hits a multi-period extreme of buying or selling activity (particularly at an apparent price high or low), which is thought to act as a warning of a potential price reversal.

While this method maybe perfectly sensible, I believe the best and simplest way to use COT data is to confirm a high level trend, and most importantly, changes in the trend. To confirm a high level trend, I do not look at the Commercial Traders' position data, but rather at the Large Traders'. Again, this group has a primary focus on trend following. As independent traders, isn't that exactly what we are trying to do as well?

In addition to the fact that Commercial Traders are counter-trend traders, studies have shown that Commercial Traders tend not to make money from futures trading, but rather to lose! Again, their primary interest is to hedge against risk in the markets in which they operate - not to speculate on price movement. Losses from futures market trading are therefore merely a cost of doing business for Commercials - just like buying insurance. In other words, go long when the Commercials are going long (or short when they are going short) and most of the time we will lose.

We want to trade with the trend, not against it. We want to pay attention to the group that is going to help with our trading, and it's usually not the Commercials! Therefore, my primary use of COT is simply to look at how Large Traders are positioned in relation to price action itself. I do not over burdened myself with look-back periods, Stochastics formula, or anything like these. Every Friday I obtain the latest COT positions data and corresponding price series, enter them into an Excel spreadsheet which then calculates the Net Position (i.e. long contracts minus short contracts) and then chart the respective series side-by-side.

If I see evidence of a high-level trend on price, and that Large Traders are on the same side of the market, I have reason to believe the trend is valid. Alternatively, if my price chart analysis shows that a high level reversal is setting up and that Large Traders have flipped from Net Short to Net Long (on a bottom), or Net Long to Net Short (on a top) consistent with the anticipated price reversal, then I have further reason to believe the reversal is actually happening. COT is therefore a high level trend confirmation tool, not usually a timing tool.

To accomplish the above objectives, I plot weekly Tuesday closing price on one chart panel, and concurrent net positions of Commercial versus Large Traders on the adjacent panel (bearing in mind that because the Commercials are always on the opposite side of the market from both Large and Small Speculators, the two plots will be perfectly symmetrical) as shown in the chart below.


In conjunction with standard trendline and Swing Point analysis, I then look for the following types of readings on the COT display:

Reading Description
Bullish Large Trader net positions line is above zero and rising: Net Long and
following the uptrend.
Bullish Crossover Large Trader net positions line crosses the central axis from below: changing bias from Net Short to Net Long, which may confirm a price bottom.
Positive Divergence Large Trader net positions line makes a higher low in relation to a lower low on price: a price bottom (they are not following through to the downside).
Bearish Large Trader net positions line is below zero and falling: Net Short and
following the downtrend.
Bearish Crossover Large Trader net positions line crosses the central axis from above: changing bias from Net Long to Net Short, which may confirm a price top.
Negative Divergence Large Trader net positions line makes a lower high in relation to a higher high on price: a price top, (they are not following through to the upside).

It should be noted however that not all readings mean what they appear to mean, and not all actions of Large Traders can be assumed to be correct at all times. Thus, when Large Traders add to a net position but price thereafter does not penetrate an important level in line with trend, we can assume the undertaking was a failure, which could verify a technical analysis calling for a reversal of some kind. Failure signals can therefore be as useful as confirmation signals.

To some seasoned traders, the approach described above may seem to be too simple and hence questionable. However, the proof, as they say, is in the pudding. The sample COT chart for the US Dollar Index covering the period from January 2007 through December 2009 as shown above plots price versus Commercial and Large Trader net positions. I have labeled all crossovers, readings which are expected to confirm tops or bottoms based on price chart analysis undertaken separately. The results of these crossovers in relation to subsequent price action are summarized below:
  • Reversal #1: Bearish crossover on Feb. 20th, 2007. Price on the USDX was 8410. Large Traders remained Net Short from that point through to Dec. 18th, 2007, when price had fallen to 7743. A short on the USDX using these two crossover signals to confirm the entry and subsequent cover long was worth (8410 -7743) = +667 points.
  • Reversal #2: Bullish crossover on Dec. 18th, 2007. Price on the USDX was 7743. Large Traders went Net Short on an abortive move that ended up quickly resolving to the prior downtrend (an example of a failure), and thus their position reversed again on Dec. 31st, 2007, when price had actually fallen further, to 7670. The maximum loss on this failure signal was limited to (7670 - 7743) = -73 points.
  • Reversal #3: Bearish crossover on Dec. 31st, 2007. Price on the USDX was 7670. Large Traders went Net Short again, and remained on that side of the market through to May 13th, 2008, when price had fallen to 7350. A short on the two crossover signals was worth up to (7670 - 7350) = +320 points.
  • Reversal #4: Bullish crossover on May 13th, 2008. Price on the USDX was 7350. Large Traders flipped Net Long, and remained on that side of the market through both an interim top, which came Mar. 3rd, 2009 at a price of 8952, and beyond to the next crossover date of May 19th, 2009, when price had come down to 8215. To the highest high in March, the long was worth up to (8952 -7350) = +1602 points. To the May crossover date, the position was worth (8215 - 7350) = +865 points.
  • Reversal #5: Bearish crossover on May 19th, 2009. Price on the USDX was 8215. Large Traders flipped short, and remained on that side of the market through to Nov. 24th, 2009, when price had come down to 7517. Using the crossover signals again to confirm an entry short and cover long yielded an opportunity worth (8215 -7517) = +698 points.
The above examples show that from February, 2007 through November, 2009, a straightforward analysis of Large Trader net position reversals on the US Dollar Index confirmed tradable opportunity in the range of 3,000 points. Note that this is not to suggest that you should approach COT data looking for extremely simplistic, 'black-box' trading signals; but rather, that you use the information to confirm other forms of analysis.
Share:

Trending Markets and Retracements

First and foremost, if the market you like to trade is not always trending on a higher timeframe like the Daily chart, don't worry. Due to the fractal nature of liquid financial markets, the characteristics of trending price action tend to look the same on all timeframes. Therefore, we might be in a corrective or consolidation sequence higher up, but when a high Reward/Risk setup is not available, one of those seemingly insignificant legs of the correction as seen on the H4 chart might actually be a sound short-lived 'trend', which is good enough for a scalping trade, when viewed on the M5 or M1 charts.


Identifying A Trending Market
So what do we mean by a trend? It's an extremely simple and important point, but one often forgotten: a down trending market creates consecutively lower lows and lower highs over time. Conversely, an up trending market creates consecutively higher highs and higher lows over time. So what we want to look for, before we even bother with indicators like Moving Averages, is Swing Points in succession that satisfy this relationship, as illustrated below.


Another way to identify trending markets without any technical indicators is to look for those legs in price action that have an almost 'linear' look to them. That is, those that move decisively with little interruption, and covering a relatively large amount of ground in a short period of time. When a sequence of lower lows and highs, or higher highs and lows, are strung together, it is likely that the market is trending.

Candlesticks can also be used to enhance the identification of trending markets. For instance, there are more down closes in a downtrend (red), and more up closes in an uptrend (green), as shown in the chart below.


Identifying Retracements
The term retracement (or sometimes referred to as a correction or pullback) generally refers to any type of counter-trend price action that interrupts the broader flow of the market for a defined period of time without reversing it on the degree of trend in which it is encountered. Put simply, we are looking for instances of where the market is moving in the 'wrong direction' relative to a trend, recovering a portion of the preceding impulsive movement, but without exceeding its startiog point.

The simple and practical way to explain why the market behaves this way is that at critical support and resistance levels, some portion of the market is taking profit. For example, as numerous traders cover shorts in a downtrend (effectively going long) at or near a confluence of support targets, selling pressure will disappear for a period of time before the market consolidation process is complete allowing for a return to trend. The traders who were more bearish than those covering their short positions sell into the buying, and away we go again.

Unlike the trend of the market, retracements have a very different appearance. In addition to recovering only a portion of the preceding impulsive movement, they often feature a lot of overlap in terms of the smaller waves comprising them, and often (but not always) unfold in sequences of threes. The important point is that without having a method of identifying these patterns, a lot of traders will be in despair at all the supposedly random 'noise' and compressed volatility they're seeing, hoping a trending market will return, but having no idea when.

The following diagram illustrates a typical contrast between these two varieties of price action, which we can call impulsive (the often 'linear' looking sequences aligned with trend) and corrective (the three-wave overlapping sequences which temporarily interrupt the trend). The downtrend is reflected in the relatively smooth and brisk movement of the down leg to the left. By contrast, we can see the strained, overlapping progress of price action once a temporary bottom is made (at a price level that represents one of those 'confluences of support' mentioned above).


In this example, we have plotted a Fibonacci retracement level which shows that at the point where the three larger subdivisions of the correction are finished (at the dashed horizontal line), the whole sequence has retraced - to a precise degree of accuracy - the Golden Mean ratio of 61.8%, a fairly standard proportion for Fibonacci retracements.

Putting It Together
So how do these two concepts - trending markets and retracements - combine? To put it simply, it is at the expected point of termination of a retracement where we're looking to jump into the market in the direction of a trend at higher degree. So a retracement slanted in the sideways-to-up direction against a valid downtrend is the 'rally' we're looking to sell. Conversely, a retracement slanted in the sideways-to-down direction against a valid uptrend is the 'dip' we're looking to buy.

We don't have to worry that on the hourly chart, for example, the retracement doesn't have the same look as the illustration above - often, pullbacks are briefer and simpler in construction, particularly in a fast-moving market. The key is that we're keeping the trend in mind, looking to trade only in that direction, and focusing our attention on finding a confluence of support or resistance that strongly suggests the end-point of the retracement.
Share:

Recent Posts

Unordered List

  • Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
  • Aliquam tincidunt mauris eu risus.
  • Vestibulum auctor dapibus neque.

Pages

Theme Support

Need our help to upload or customize this blogger template? Contact me with details about the theme customization you need.